บ้าน ข่าว

ข่าว บริษัท เกี่ยวกับ Q355B vs Q235B Steel Structures: Comparison of Material Differences, Application Scenarios, and Cost-Effectiveness

ความคิดเห็นของลูกค้า
This company not only responded quickly but also issued a customized design plan within 3 days.By optimizing the truss node design, they reduced material costs while ensuring structural safety.The final products were delivered on time and successfully passed acceptance.

—— Logistics center

Top-tier products, reliable service! Stable steel structure quality, fast installation, transparent costs, and prompt problem-solving. Zero issues across 5 cooperative projects—our absolute first choice for steel structure procurement!

—— Animal Health Company

From tentative first cooperation to deep binding today, this company has gained our full trust in 3 years. They do their steel structures never disappoint. This sense of responsibility is more valuable than the products themselves!

—— Home Furnishing Ltd.

สนทนาออนไลน์ตอนนี้ฉัน
บริษัท ข่าว
Q355B vs Q235B Steel Structures: Comparison of Material Differences, Application Scenarios, and Cost-Effectiveness
ข่าว บริษัท ล่าสุดเกี่ยวกับ Q355B vs Q235B Steel Structures: Comparison of Material Differences, Application Scenarios, and Cost-Effectiveness

As two of the most commonly used carbon structural steels in steel structure projects, many customers struggle to choose between Q355B and Q235B during procurement. This article provides a comprehensive comparison from key dimensions to help you make quick decisions:


Comparison Dimension Q355B Steel Structure Q235B Steel Structure
Yield Strength  ≥355MPa, high strength grade ≥235MPa, ordinary strength grade
Application Scenarios Long-span buildings, heavy industrial plants, bridge projects, high-rise steel structures Small workshops, warehouses, simple sheds, secondary load-bearing components
Material Usage High strength, less usage under the same load, 20%-30% weight reduction achievable Lower strength, requires larger cross-sectional size, more usage
Cost Performance Slightly higher unit ton price, but lower total cost due to reduced usage Lower unit ton price, but limited long-term cost-effectiveness due to higher usage
Construction Difficulty Welding and bolt connection applicable, mature technology Convenient processing and construction, suitable for rapid implementation of small projects


Conclusion: Q355B is a better choice if the project involves long spans, heavy loads, or requires structural weight reduction; Q235B can meet basic needs for small simple buildings or projects with limited budgets. It is recommended to conduct a comprehensive evaluation based on project design standards and long-term usage requirements.

ผับเวลา : 2025-11-26 11:05:24 >> รายการข่าว
รายละเอียดการติดต่อ
steelnova Co., Ltd

ผู้ติดต่อ: Ms. Alice Cao

โทร: 18561877588

แฟกซ์: 86--18561877588

ส่งคำถามของคุณกับเราโดยตรง (0 / 3000)