Ana sayfa Haberler

hakkında şirket haberleri Q355B vs Q235B Steel Structures: Comparison of Material Differences, Application Scenarios, and Cost-Effectiveness

Tüm ürünler

Modular Steel Structures
(23)

Primary Steel Frame
(20)

Steel Structure Workshop
(1)

Prefabricated Steel Buildings
(1)

Clean Workshop
(6)

Bracing Frame
(17)

Steel Structural Connections And Fastenings
(21)

Secondary Steel Frame
(2)

Steel Building Envelope
(1)

Müşteri yorumları

This company not only responded quickly but also issued a customized design plan within 3 days.By optimizing the truss node design, they reduced material costs while ensuring structural safety.The final products were delivered on time and successfully passed acceptance.

—— Logistics center

Top-tier products, reliable service! Stable steel structure quality, fast installation, transparent costs, and prompt problem-solving. Zero issues across 5 cooperative projects—our absolute first choice for steel structure procurement!

—— Animal Health Company

From tentative first cooperation to deep binding today, this company has gained our full trust in 3 years. They do their steel structures never disappoint. This sense of responsibility is more valuable than the products themselves!

—— Home Furnishing Ltd.

Ben sohbet şimdi

şirket Haberler

Q355B vs Q235B Steel Structures: Comparison of Material Differences, Application Scenarios, and Cost-Effectiveness

As two of the most commonly used carbon structural steels in steel structure projects, many customers struggle to choose between Q355B and Q235B during procurement. This article provides a comprehensive comparison from key dimensions to help you make quick decisions:

Comparison Dimension	Q355B Steel Structure	Q235B Steel Structure
Yield Strength	≥355MPa, high strength grade	≥235MPa, ordinary strength grade
Application Scenarios	Long-span buildings, heavy industrial plants, bridge projects, high-rise steel structures	Small workshops, warehouses, simple sheds, secondary load-bearing components
Material Usage	High strength, less usage under the same load, 20%-30% weight reduction achievable	Lower strength, requires larger cross-sectional size, more usage
Cost Performance	Slightly higher unit ton price, but lower total cost due to reduced usage	Lower unit ton price, but limited long-term cost-effectiveness due to higher usage
Construction Difficulty	Welding and bolt connection applicable, mature technology	Convenient processing and construction, suitable for rapid implementation of small projects

Conclusion: Q355B is a better choice if the project involves long spans, heavy loads, or requires structural weight reduction; Q235B can meet basic needs for small simple buildings or projects with limited budgets. It is recommended to conduct a comprehensive evaluation based on project design standards and long-term usage requirements.

Pub Zaman : 2025-11-26 11:05:24 >> haber listesi

İletişim bilgileri

steelnova Co., Ltd

İlgili kişi: Ms. Alice Cao

Tel: 18561877588

Faks: 86--18561877588

hakkında şirket haberleri Q355B vs Q235B Steel Structures: Comparison of Material Differences, Application Scenarios, and Cost-Effectiveness

Modular Steel Structures

Primary Steel Frame

Steel Structure Workshop

Prefabricated Steel Buildings

Clean Workshop

Bracing Frame

Steel Structural Connections And Fastenings

Secondary Steel Frame

Steel Building Envelope

Modular Steel Structures

Customized Size Modular Steel Structures Easy Assembly Steel Structure Building

Multi Storey Modular Steel Structure Office Building Eco Friendly Customized Size

Modular Design Steel Framed Office Buildings Earthquake Resistance Open Plan

Primary Steel Frame

Custom Structural Asymmetrical Primary Steel Frame For Irregular Architectural Layouts

Endwall Primary Steel Frame Terminal Support For Industrial Buildings And Warehouses

Truss Beam Primary Steel Frame Large Span Structural System High Strength